One-Day Live Medico-Legal Training (18 Oct)→
All Judgements
16Vicarious Liability

Maharaja Agrasen Hospital & Ors. v. Master Rishabh Sharma & Ors.

Supreme Court of India2019Civil Appeal No. 6619 of 2016

Court

Supreme Court

Year

2019

Category

Vicarious Liability

Compensation

Rs. 76,00,000 awarded to the complainant

Background

Master Rishabh Sharma was born prematurely at 32 weeks and admitted to Maharaja Agrasen Hospital. Despite being at high risk, the pediatricians and ophthalmologist failed to advise or conduct a mandatory ROP (Retinopathy of Prematurity) check-up. The disease remained undiagnosed and progressed to Stage 5, causing the baby irreversible total blindness. Furthermore, the hospital withheld the medical records for over two years after discharge.

The Legal Question

Whether the treating doctors and the hospital were medically negligent in failing to screen the premature baby for ROP, and whether the hospital can be held vicariously liable for the negligence of its doctors.

The Court's Decision

The Supreme Court found the hospital and doctors guilty of gross medical negligence for failing to conduct the ROP screening and inform the parents of the risks. The Court affirmed that the hospital is vicariously liable for its doctors and enhanced the compensation to Rs. 76,00,000.

Principle Established

A hospital is vicariously liable for the medical negligence committed by the doctors engaged or empanelled by it. Furthermore, the standard of care requires adherence to established medical protocols and the duty to inform patients of material risks.

Relevant Legal Provisions

Consumer Protection Act, 1986Indian Medical Council Act, 1956
Practical Impact

What This Means for Your Practice

    Hospitals are vicariously liable for the negligence of doctors they employ or empanel.

    Strict adherence to standard medical protocols, such as mandatory screenings, is legally required.

    Failure to maintain and provide medical records within 72 hours of a request constitutes professional misconduct.

    Doctors have a legal duty to inform patients and guardians of material risks and necessary follow-up care.

Disclaimer: The case summary, legal analysis, and practical notes on this page are for educational purposes only and do not constitute legal advice. The original PDF is sourced from public Indian court records. MedicoLegalAid does not claim ownership of the original judgement.

Chat with Us