Dr. S. Balagopal v. State of Tamil Nadu & Anr.
Court
SC
Year
2026
Category
Informed Consent
Compensation
Criminal proceedings against the doctor quashed
Background
A pediatric surgeon performed an orchidectomy on a child with an undescended testis. The father alleged consent was given only for orchidopexy and that the doctor forged the consent form by later inserting 'orchidectomy'. A medical board found the removed testis was dysplastic, making orchidectomy the correct preventive measure against malignancy.
The Legal Question
Whether criminal proceedings against the doctor for alleged forgery of the consent form and negligence should be quashed under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C., even though tampering is typically a question of fact for trial.
The Court's Decision
The Supreme Court allowed the appeal and quashed the criminal proceedings, holding that the procedure was a valid alternative and there was no material evidence of interpolation on the consent form.
The High Court's power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to consider questions of fact is not absolutely barred, particularly when necessary to prevent abuse of process and secure the ends of justice.
Relevant Legal Provisions
What This Means for Your Practice
Ensure consent forms explicitly state all possible alternative procedures that might be intra-operatively necessary.
Independent medical board opinions carry significant weight in negating allegations of medical negligence or malafide intent.
Doctors are protected from malicious criminal prosecution if their actions are medically justified and documented properly.
Original Judgement
Explore More Cases
Disclaimer: The case summary, legal analysis, and practical notes on this page are for educational purposes only and do not constitute legal advice. The original PDF is sourced from public Indian court records. MedicoLegalAid does not claim ownership of the original judgement.